Comments for Madeleine McCann

Comment on Guestbook by mari knapp

mari knapp — Sun, 02 May 2010 20:38:34 +0000

why leave them on there own when you could have had a sitter ,i belive you planned for her to be taken no parent would go out for a meal and leave there children you both are the worst child abusers you know what has happened so tell the truth or we will its been 3 years time to telllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Comment on Guestbook by molly wheeldon

molly wheeldon — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:38:03 +0000

I do hope some ones finds little maddie. Who ever has took her is sick in the head,who would her little maddie she is such a little girl. God Bless Maddie hope nothing bad has happend and it ends in a happy ending.

Comment on Guestbook by john

john — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:42:34 +0000

The McCann’s are GUILTY!! LIARS!!LIARS!!!LIARS!!!!

Comment on Payne suspected of paedophilia by Alexandra, Portugal

Alexandra, Portugal — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:03:57 +0000

It’s funny your interpretation of the facts. Looks like Payne is being stabbed in the back. And who has helped McCanns with evidence was Jane Tanner and her partner. Once again a crime does not happen like planned. When Tanner was supposed to see a man carrying a child, she should be alone in the area. At that time Gerry should be already in the restaurant after opening the windows and so on. Or should be doing his way to the beach. Again, he had no luck because a English pal was around with his baby and Gerry had to stay talking about the weather. That’s why the plan has failed to target an abductor that, if really was there, should be seen by all of them.
Mysterious is the way of the truth.

Comment on Day 469: 14/08/2008 by ray

ray — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:20:29 +0000

I recently started to take an interest in the case and am shocked at the amount of inconsistencies in the statements given by G&K and their friends.How can it be that only 12hrs after the event certain people Mcanns,Tanner,Paynes can not remember simple things when asked,,like, what they were wearing at the time,what they ate,what times the so called checks were carried out.these are supposed to be educated people,professionals,doctors for petes sake and yet they can not recall.However they can remember exactly when they went to college,when they went on holiday,what they ate on the plane etc etc.In fact they can remember every thing in detail until that night.Now i am now Sherlock Holmes but having read a great deal from the files i smell a rat or 2 at least.How could KM refuse to answer the police questions?.I have an open mind on this but the evidence when read by even a layman like me points directly to the parents and a few of their friends.And then theres the dogs,the video of the dogs is very strong evidence(Dogs dont lie).Another thing that stinks is the constant need for funds,if they need money to find Madeleine why not sell there big house.And how on earth could any parent go jogging and play tennis while their child is missing.They have a lot to answer,and soon the world will know the awful truth.

Comment on British police failed to stop DNA evidence in McCann case from being made public by Sharon

Sharon — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:01:18 +0000

On July 13th 2009, The Madeleine Foundation wrote to the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, in relation to the petition to order a review of the role of the British Police in the Madeleine McCann case.

Here is a link to the petition which lapsed on July 31st 2009, with 631 signatures. To date there has been no reply from the Prime Minister despite numerous e-mails from ourselves and our MP`s

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Britpolicereview/

The original letter to Gordon Brown which addresses a number of areas of concern, including the failure to forward vital information to Portugal and displaying a link to a fund set up by the suspects in a very serious case, can be read here.

http://madeleinefoundation.org/main/2009/07/letter-to-prime-minister-gordon-brown/

I can confirm that the Madeleine Foundation has received a very un-satisfactory reply and many items in the letter appear to have been disregarded. As a result, the Madeleine Foundation intends to engage in further correspondence on this issue, given the large number of topics that were disgracefully brushed aside.

A copy of the reply from the Home office can be found here:

https://share.acrobat.com/adc/document.do?docid=9a1ef0ed-b17a-435d-a9aa-ccd617babac7

http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B2S1HIgsj7vTZDgwYmZjZjUtNDE5Ny00ODZjLThhYzUtZGZlYzQ1ODM0YzIw&hl=en

Please sign the petitions to re-open the case and to stop the Mccanns from silencing those who bring us the facts of this case.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/please-re-open-madeleine-mccanns-case

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/7/freedom-of-expression

Comment on Payne suspected of paedophilia by Lyn

Lyn — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:16:16 +0000

Yes, I agree the Smith’s sighting is something the McCann’s chose to stay quiet about and their PD’s do not appear to be investigating this sighting at all.

Also, I am somewhat baffled by the Gaspars Statements and again this is something their PD’s do not appear to be investigating – so much for leaving no stone unturned.

However, I have been reading on another site ‘TheSergeantsInn’ about the Devon connection between these two English doctors the Gaspars, who suspect David Payne, and what appears to be a bit of an inconsistency in their statements about the dates of their meetings with the McCann’s. Is there something else behind their statements? Is it possible they are trying to deliberately avert attention away from the McCann’s and on to David Payne on purpose? I was thinking they are/were good friends to the McCann’s but not to David Payne. Having said that, they mention Gerry as well, but definitely they single out David Payne with Gerry just going along with his ‘joke’. I wonder if this is all done on purpose to explain away Gerry’s behaviour just in case somebody else ‘on the outside’ may have seen it. In particular I was thinking this behaviour was also supposed to have taken place in a restaurant on another occasion. It seems to be similar to the way the McCann’s tried to explain themselves about Madeline crying, like damage limitation, a sort of red herring with them trying to justify by saying ‘ the abductor’ must have tried the previous night and woke up Madeline and this is why Mrs. Fenn heard crying. I am thinking if eventually Madeleine is found (dead) and the case is resurrected and it was proven something happened to her in the apartment, the McCann’s will all too readily then point the finger at another of their party. I think they are so desperate for this not to be ‘their fault’ they would stoop to anything. I just can’t decide if the Gaspars are really on the side of the McCann’s or not. After all, I would like to know if the Gaspars contacted the McCann’s before giving the Police their statements. Was this one of the deleted phone calls? After all, they were supposed to be very close and intimate friends of the McCann’s so I would have thought they would have contacted the McCann’s firstly to give their condolences and then to raise their ‘suspicions’ with the McCann’s. So, was their Statement planned on purpose? I think it was given to the Police a few weeks after the disappearance, so why the delay? Is this why the McCann’s have remained so friendly with the Payne’s, so David Payne does not suspect them for the story about his behaviour? Is David Payne going to be made the fall guy when eventually everything comes out?

Interestingly a lady called Yvonne who tried to ‘help’ in the days that followed also has a Devon connection and also sited David Payne’s behaviour. Is this a coincidence or was it again planned? Or perhaps it’s my mind working overtime but I think David Payne is being stabbed in the back.

Comment on Guestbook by louise harffey

louise harffey — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:37:49 +0000

What a wonderful site, such alot of work involved . I will be logging on daily until the truth comes out. your site will be reference for students of criminology, media studies, psychology and goodness knows what else for years to come. God bless poor Maddie and all who seek justice for whatever happened to her, louise harffey